Christina Crawford

Lied

The Truth Behind "Mommie Dearest "

Bonus section: The LaLonde Exposé - Exposing Casey LaLonde

The LaLonde Expo$é


Who Is Casey LaLonde?

     Casey LaLonde is the youngest grandchild of late film actress Joan Crawford. He was born on March 16th, 1972. Crawford's eldest grandchild is Christopher's daughter, Janet, born in 1961. Despite LaLonde being Joan's youngest grandchild, and estranged from all six of his cousins, LaLonde has created himself as a faux "representative" of Joan Crawford's estate and family.

     Following the death of his mother, Cathy LaLonde, in January 2020, LaLonde has falsely claimed that he and his sister are the only Crawford family members remaining. This is not true. Joan Crawford has EIGHT living grandchildren.


      Casey LaLonde formally worked for many years as the township manager for West Goshen Township in Pennsylvania. According to this blog by a resident of that community, there were issues with LaLonde. Casey LaLonde ultimately resigned from this position in December 2021.

His resignation came shortly after an incident occurred between LaLonde and the town residents which is documented in the above blog. 


     Casey LaLonde passed away on June 15, 2026 due to complications with pneumonia. 




Breakfast At Dominique's - "The Grand Hotel Blend"

     In January 2022, an Arkansas business named "Breakfast At Dominique's LLC," which is a new business ran solely by a 22 year-old woman, publicly announced they would soon market a coffee flavor named "The Grand Hotel blend," and featuring Joan Crawford's image on the product with the claim that the coffee blend is "legally licensed by the Estate of Joan Crawford." 

     The legitimate clearances for Benedict's other coffee blends, which feature the images of James Dean, Hedy Lamarr and Jean Harlow, were obtained through CMG Worldwide, which is a firm who handles the use of likeness for those celebrities. Unlike LaLonde with the "Joan Crawford Estate," these celebrities have legitimate, legally-established, estates and are properly represented by an actual representation firm. 


     In a February 8th, 2022 statement to the Arkansas State Attorney General's Office by "Breakfast At Dominique's" owner, Dominique Benedict,  made the following false statements: 


     "The [New York Right of Publicity] law was overturned by the state (false). The will and Joan's possessions all legally belong to Casey LaLonde (false), whose team reached out to me with the idea for this blend."


     I refer those reading this statement by Benedict to the information above regarding the legal post-mortem publicity rights of Joan Crawford, and why everything stated by Benedict is completely false.


     Because Casey LaLonde is not a legal representative of the Joan Crawford estate, and, by default, has no legal right to license Crawford's image, the advertisements by Breakfast At Dominique's is fraudulent under Arkansas State law and Federal trade practices.


     The false claim this coffee is "legally licensed" from "Joan Crawford's Estate" may entice Crawford fans, or the general public, to purchase this product with the assumption that the proceeds benefit the six charities named in Joan Crawford's will. Thereby deceiving good faith consumers.

     In addition, Breakfast At Dominique's has not presented any evidence they have obtained usage rights for using the film title "Grand Hotel" for the name of their coffee blend. 

     This business' owner, Dominique Benedict, is aware of the above information, however, she has chosen to ignore these laws and is continuing her fraudulent business practices within her partnership with Casey LaLonde and Gary Sweeney.


     It is a violation of Arkansas State law and Federal law for Breakfast At Dominique's to perpetuate the false claim that her coffee blend is "legally licensed" from the estate of Joan Crawford when no such estate exists, and Benedict has been made aware of such.


     A consumer complaint can be filed against this business with the Arkansas State Attorney General's office and the Federal trade Commission. The business details needed when filing these complaints are below, along with Arkansas state law regarding false advertising:


Breakfast At Dominique's Company Information:

Owner: Dominique Benedict

Business address: 719 Dennis Street, Glenwood, Arkansas 71943

Business website: www.BreakfastAtDominiques.com

Business email address: Info@BreakfastAtDominiques.com



Arkansas Code
Title 5 - Criminal Offenses
Subtitle 4 - Offenses Against Property
Chapter 37 - Forgery and Fraudulent Practices
Subchapter 5 - Business and Commercial Offenses Generally 5-37-515. False advertising generally


(a) (1) It is the purpose and intent of this section to prohibit false, fraudulent, and misleading advertising and to prescribe a penalty for a person purchasing false, fraudulent, and misleading advertising in a newspaper, on radio or television, or otherwise causing false, fraudulent, and misleading advertising to be placed before the public.


(2) It is not the intention of this section and nothing in this section shall be construed to penalize or place responsibility upon any newspaper, radio station, television station, publisher, or other person, firm, or corporation for publishing, broadcasting, telecasting, or otherwise disseminating any advertisement purchased by any person, firm, corporation, or association.


(b) No person, firm, corporation, group, or association, with intent to sell or in anywise dispose of real estate, merchandise, a security, service, or anything offered by that person, firm, corporation, group, or association, directly or indirectly, to the public for sale or distribution, or with intent to increase the consumption thereof or to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto or to acquire title thereto or an interest therein, shall make, publish, disseminate, circulate, or place before the public or cause, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed before the public in this state, in a newspaper or other publication, on radio or television, or in the form of a book, notice, handbill, poster, bill, circular, pamphlet, or letter, or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding real estate, merchandise, a security, service, or anything so offered to the public, which advertisement contains any assertion, representation, or statement of fact that is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.


(c) (1) It is deemed deceptive advertising, within the meaning of this subsection, for any person, firm, or corporation, engaged in the business of buying or selling new or secondhand merchandise, wearing apparel, jewelry, furniture, a piano, phonograph, or other musical instrument, motor vehicle, stock, or, generally, any form of real, personal, or mixed property, or in the business of furnishing any kind of service or investment to advertise such articles, property, or service for sale, in any manner indicating that the sale is being made by a private party or householder not engaged in such business.


(2) Any such firm, corporation, group, or association engaged in any such business in advertising goods, property, or service for sale shall affirmatively and unmistakably indicate and state that the seller is a business concern and not a private party.


(d) (1) Any person, firm, corporation, group, association, or the agent or servant of any other firm, corporation, group, or association violating any provision of this section is guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or be imprisoned in the county jail not more than sixty (60) days, or by both fine and imprisonment.


(2) Each sale, advertisement, or representation in contravention of a provision of this section is deemed a distinct offense and subjects the offender to punishment under subdivision (d)(1) of this section.





Yousuf Karsh Portrait Auction

      When Cathy LaLonde passed away in January 2020, her two children, Casey and Carla LaLonde, presumably received all of their mother's property, including any remaining Joan Crawford property that Cathy had not already sold in one of the prior auctions of her mother's property.

     On July 16th, 2021, Casey LaLonde, through the online auction house Heritage Auctions, sold a framed Yousuf Karsh portrait of Joan Crawford that Casey not only claimed to have belonged to Crawford, but claimed was THE portrait that is prominently featured in the background of a well-known 1959 Eve Arnold photo of Crawford. However, with the claim that it was being sold in an alternate frame. The framed Karsh portrait sold for: $7,500.00.


     On July 18th, 2021, Casey LaLonde was featured in a video interview by the YouTube Channel "Hollywood Kitchen." During the interview, a suspiciously similar framed Karsh portrait is visible hanging on the wall in LaLonde's home.

     This begs the question: Did Casey sell THE Karsh portrait captured in the 1959 Eve Arnold photo? Or, did Casey sell a duplicate print of the Karsh portrait with the false claim that it was the Karsh portrait captured in the 1959 Eve Arnold photo?

     In evaluating if LaLonde's video interview was conducted prior to him sending the framed portrait to the auction house, Heritage Auctions was contacted. Their representative stated they had possession of the framed portrait that was sold prior to the auction. Likewise, when the YouTube channel who interviewed Casey was contacted, the channel owner stated she uploads her videos very quickly after they are filmed, within the same day or the next day. Furthermore, the "Letter of Provenance" that Casey LaLonde signed to accompany the framed portrait is dated May 18th, 2021, suggesting that is the approximate timeframe for when the auctioned item was sent to Heritage Auctions.

     If Cathy LaLonde happened to have had TWO copies of this Karsh portrait, then how does Casey LaLonde know WHICH one was the portrait featured in the Eve Arnold photo of Crawford?


     Additionally, regardless if this was THE Karsh portrait, the sale of this item that belonged to Casey's mother, Cathy, may have been illegal.

This webmaster has confirmed with the Lehigh County, Pennsylvania Clerk of Court probate division that no probate has ever been filed for Cathy LaLonde. Therefore, the sale of any of Cathy LaLonde's assets without first opening probate in the county where she died is a violation of Pennsylvania state law. The Lehigh County Clerk of Court's office can be contacted at: 


Telephone number: 610-782-3170

Address: 455 Hamilton Street, #122, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101





Graymalkin Media And Joan Crawford's Autobiographies

     In 2017, Graymalkin Media LLC republished Joan Crawford's two autobiographies: "A Portrait of Joan" (1962) and "My Way of Life" (1971).

The company's owner, David Zindel, signed an invalid agreement with Casey LaLonde to republish these autobiographies despite the fact that LaLonde had no legal rights to either book. 


     In addition, Graymalkin Media obtained a 10-sided set of 16 rpm records featuring Joan Crawford reading her autobiography, "My Way of Life," and is now illegally claiming copyright ownership of this recording. Graymalkin Media obtained this record set under the false assumption that they are the sole records in existence of Crawford reading "My Way of Life." They are not. In fact, many of these records were manufactured. The only question is how many may still exist today.

     In 1973, Joan Crawford audio recorded her autobiography for the Library of Congress' National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled organization. Crawford was one author of many who audio recorded their books for this organization. The audio records were then distributed to blind schools and libraries around America.

     Because this recording was made prior to the 1976 United States Copyright Act, and the fact that no copyright for the audio was ever recorded with the United States Copyright office, or expressed on the physical records themselves, theoretically this audio would be in public domain.

If any entity is the legal copyright owner, it would be the recorder of the content, The National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled.

Not Graymalkin Media or Casey LaLonde. Despite these facts, Graymalkin Media and Casey have attempted to stop this audio recording from being made accessible for free on the internet.

     Beyond the obvious deceit regarding this situation, it is even more deplorable that Joan Crawford recorded this audio for the benefit of the blind, and devoted much of her life to helping the disabled. However, Casey LaLonde and Graymalkin Media have devised a means to make this goodwill action by Joan Crawford a money-making scheme for themselves.


     Additionally, this situation also involves the misappropriation of Federal property. In September 2017, Casey was interviewed by Fox News, who reported:

     "This year, Casey LaLonde reissued her 1962 autobiography, as well as a 1971 lifestyle guide titled “My Way of Life.” The audiobook for that self-help book is actually Crawford reading her own words.

“In 1973, a couple of years after the book was published, she did a recording of herself reading it,” he explained. "It was pressed on vinyl. We located what we believe is the only copy in the world, bought it, and had it digitized. So it’s Joan herself reading the entire copy with extra comments peppered throughout.”


     For clarification, Casey LaLonde did not "locate" the vinyl record set of Crawford reading "My Way of Life." The records were listed for sale on eBay by a private seller. The private seller who sold this record set to Graymalkin Media obtained the set as a loan-out from the Library of Congress. The private seller never returned the vinyl record set to the Library of Congress and sold it to Graymalkin Media and Casey LaLonde. Therefore, Graymalkin Media and LaLonde are not only illegally claiming copyright ownership of this material, they are in possession of misappropriated Federal property. Both Graymalkin Media and Casey LaLonde have been made aware of this situation. They have chosen to ignore it, and continue illegally selling this audio recording on Amazon and Audible for their own monetary gain.


     You can contact a criminal investigator with the Library of Congress' Office of The Inspector General here, and notify them that Graymalkin Media owner David Zindel (11755 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1250, Los Angeles, California 90025) and Casey LaLonde (820 Little Washington Road
Downingtown, PA 19335) are in illegal possession of this absconded Federal property.

     (Note: Graymalkin Media has changed addresses repeatedly. Their other addresses include: 

1370 Veteran Avenue, apartment #320, Los Angeles, California 90024; 

1835 Holmby Avenue, Apt #202, Los Angeles, California 90025;  and 

1413 Greenfield Avenue, apartment #103, Los Angeles, California 90025)





Licensing News Reel Footage

     In December 2011, Casey LaLonde attended Doyle's Joan Crawford auction in New York. The auction contained items that once belonged to Crawford, and was inherited by LaLonde's mother, Cathy. LaLonde did not even know about this auction of his own family's heirlooms until he read about it on the internet.

     Among LaLonde's auction bid wins were a box containing film and audio reels. LaLonde paid $10,000 for this auction lot. The lot contained approximately fifty items, most being 16mm film reels. The large majority of these recordings are interviews and footage filmed by news agencies and other media entities. As such, these individual agencies and entities own any legal copyright of this material if it does not fall into the arena of public domain. Joan Crawford did not own the copyright of this material, nor her children, and definitely not Casey LaLonde. However, for his own monetary gain, Casey LaLonde is actively attempting to license this material, which may legally belong to other people and agencies.


     On a side note, as a Joan Crawford researcher, I know why Crawford had this footage and who gave it to her. However, at the risk of giving Casey LaLonde further "stories" to share in his quest to license this material, I will not be providing that information here.





Licensing The Joan Crawford Home Movies

     Beginning in, at least, 2009, Casey LaLonde has attempted to license footage of Joan Crawford that he allegedly absconded from his mother's home in 1997. According to sources, Casey's mother did not give him permission to remove this footage from her possession.

     Beyond this issue, Casey LaLonde has no legal right to license it. This is because if the copyright of the footage belongs to anyone, it belongs to the heirs of Charles McCabe, the photographer who filmed it. McCabe was a San Francisco newspaper reporter with whom Joan Crawford was romantically involved. At some point the footage was given by McCabe to Crawford, however, there is no record of any copyright transfer to Crawford by McCabe. Therefore, Casey LaLonde holds no legal copyright to the footage which would legally permit him the authority to license its use. However, LaLonde continues his attempt to "license" its use to filmmakers at the rate of $50 per second of film.


     In addition to his attempts to license the footage for use, LaLonde reportedly screens the footage at various venues for a fee. According to LaLonde, he was paid a fee for his appearance during the 2013 TCM cruise and at the TCM film festival. 

     The venues where Casey has reportedly screened the Crawford home movie footage includes: The TCM Film Forum in Los Angeles, California (April 2010); the New York Film Forum movie house (multiple times); the 2010 Rehoboth Beach Independent Film Festival in Delaware; UCLA; the 2013 TCM Cruise; the Metropolitan Museum of Art in Manhattan; The Castro Theatre in San Francisco, California.


     According to a September 2020 email from Casey LaLonde, the fee for his "work" to participate in a Joan Crawford documentary project would be $2,000 per day, with a three day minimum, for a total of $6,000. In addition, Casey would require an "executive producer" credit to receive the "family's seal of approval." 

     Aside from Casey LaLonde's personal fee, he has attempted to charge $50 per SECOND ($3,000 per minute) for the home movie footage and the news agency footage he obtained at the Doyle auction. NONE of which is legally copyright-owned by Casey LaLonde.

    Casey LaLonde's large "fees" alone contradict his ongoing claim that his only motivation regarding Joan Crawford is correcting the prior wrongs to Crawford's image. 


     In 2013, Christina Crawford toured America performing a one-woman show entitled "Surviving Mommie Dearest." During her show, Christina was showing excerpts from the Crawford home movie footage. In response, Casey LaLonde sent her a cease and desist letter to stop using the footage in her show. The act itself is noble; anything to hinder Christina's ridiculous efforts to remain relevant while continuing to spread her lies. However, Casey LaLonde had no legal right to send Christina Crawford such a letter for the reasons described above.


     On May 10th, 2017, the 40th anniversary of Joan Crawford's death, Casey LaLonde appeared on stage at Film Forum in New York, alongside Lypsinka, the same drag performer Christina Crawford hired for the anniversary of Crawford's death in 1998 to imitate/mock Crawford onstage. 




The Joan Crawford Tonner Dolls

     The first known venture by Casey LaLonde to use the faux "The Estate of Joan Crawford" title was in 2009, when he "licensed" the use of Crawford's image to Robert Tonner for a series of Joan Crawford dolls. Casey LaLonde had no authority to license Joan Crawford's image. 

     In addition to wrongly "licensing" Crawford's image to Robert Tonner, LaLonde traveled to various doll conventions, which appeared to be for personal prestige.


     Note: The Joan Crawford signature on the Joan Crawford Tonner doll boxes and its marketing is wrong. It is not Crawford's signature, it is the signature of Crawford's secretary, Betty Barker. Barker frequently signed letters on behalf of Joan, and such a letter by Barker is apparently where that signature was lifted. Casey LaLonde has continued to use this wrong signature on other illegally merchandised products.





Legal Notice

All information provided herein is factual, documented, and provided to This Webmaster and others in interviews with Casey LaLonde, Cathy LaLonde, Cathy LaLonde's friends, and others in the Joan Crawford fan/research community who have had interactions with Casey LaLonde.

All sources have been preserved.


In 2022, Casey LaLonde was contacted regarding the information provided on this website for his response. LaLonde did not respond.

LaLonde passed away on June 15, 2026. To this Webmaster's knowledge, not once did LaLonde publicly deny any statements made on

this website regarding his conduct and behavior.




The webmaster of "Joan Crawford: The Best of Everything" chastises Casey LaLonde on her website.

"Casey, either you're ignorant, or you think Joan fans are flat-out stupid":




The Joan Crawford games table that Casey purchased at the 2011 Doyle auction for $2,125.00:




After the death of Cathy LaLonde in 2020, Casey altered his profession on Linkedin with the claim

that he is the "Chief Operating Officer" involving rights and clearances from the "Joan Crawford Estate":




"Feud: Bette & Joan" and Olivia de Havilland

     When FX began production of "Feud: Bette & Joan," Casey LaLonde contacted the producers to provide them with a copy of his allegedly absconded Joan Crawford home movie footage. The footage was filmed in the early 1940s, and had absolutely no correlation to the topic of this television series, which depicts Crawford during the 1960s. This was, again, another attempt by Casey LaLonde for public prestige and notoriety. In turn, "Feud," included a scene in the final episode of the series featuring LaLonde and his sister, Carla. 


     Despite "Feud" falsely, and unfairly, depicting Joan Crawford as an unprofessional, emotional, alcoholic, Casey LaLonde praised the series while also stating in interviews that he did not even know if his mother, Cathy, watched it.


      In 2017, Casey gave an interview to DailyMail.com who reported:

     "LaLonde is a big fan of the hit series, which is about the rivalry between Crawford and her Hollywood nemesis Bette Davis, played by Jessica Lange and Susan Sarandon. In addition to praising Lange for her ‘tremendous’ portrayal of his grandmother, he says: ‘Ryan and the writing team have gone to extremes to get away from a very one-dimensional, two-dimensional look at both and to create a real, three-dimensional, complex look at their lives and personalities. He even vows to encourage his mother to watch the series. ‘I think it would actually be a good thing for her to see, definitely,’ LaLonde says of his 70-year-old mother, who is also portrayed on the show, which centers on the 1962 making of "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?." And she may be watching, I don’t know. I hope she is because it’s much better."


     When Olivia de Havilland filed a lawsuit against the producers of "Feud," Casey LaLonde attempted to defend the grossly inaccurate series against de Havilland by submitting a legal declaration to the court in favor of "Feud." Obviously, this was due to LaLonde's own personal fondness of a series that briefly portrayed him, and not out of any actual respect he has for Joan Crawford, who was horribly misaligned in the series.





Not A Representative of Joan Crawford's Estate

     Starting in 2009, Casey LaLonde has wrongly "licensed" the use of Joan Crawford's image to unsuspecting businesses.

As of 2022, LaLonde's latest endeavor is "licensing" the use of Joan Crawford's image to a small Arkansas coffee company, and "authorizing" a Joan Crawford biography to be written by an author who is not very knowledge of Joan Crawford's life and career.

     Shortly after the death of Cathy LaLonde, Casey LaLonde updated his LinkedIn profile to state that he is the "Chief Operating Officer" of the "Joan Crawford Estate." For one, no he is not. Secondly, there is not such title as the "CEO" of a person's estate.

     Joan Crawford does not have, and has never had, any person or entity license her image. This is because of two very basic legal reasons:


1) Joan Crawford died in New York state on May 10th, 1977. At the time of Joan Crawford's death, New York state had no post-mortem right of publicity law. This means that when a person died, their right of publicity died with them. No one can own, or legally control, the rights to that person's likeness.


2) In Joan Crawford's last will and testament, she did not explicitly name any beneficiary to her right of publicity and the use of her likeness. Therefore, theoretically, even if New York did have a post-mortem right of publicity law at the time of Crawford's death, she did not name any person as the beneficiary to this right.


     Since the death of Cathy LaLonde in January 2020, Casey seems to think he now holds the full legal right to license Joan Crawford's image for commercial use even though his mother, Cathy, held zero legal rights to the use of Crawford's image for the reasons stated above.

     Casey LaLonde has repeatedly, falsely, stated that Joan Crawford's 1976 will bequeathed all "personal" or "real" to his mother, Cathy, and falsely claims that includes Crawford's legal right of publicity. However, that is not what Joan Crawford's will states.

     Joan Crawford's will (which can be read here in its entirety) explicitly bequeaths Cathy LaLonde with all tangible personal property.

New York state law explicitly states that "tangible personal property" is limited to only physical property. 


     Cornell Law School defines tangible property as:

     "personal property that can be felt or touched, and can be physically relocated."


     New York state law defines "tangible personal property" as:


Section 526.8 - Tangible personal property
(a) Definition. The term tangible personal property means corporeal personal property of any nature having a material existence and perceptibility to the human senses. Tangible personal property includes, without limitation:

(1) raw materials, such as wood, metal, rubber and minerals;
(2) manufactured items, such as gasoline, oil, chemicals, jewelry, furniture, machinery, clothing, vehicles, appliances, lighting fixtures, building materials;
(3) artistic items, such as sketches, paintings, photographs, moving picture films and recordings;
(4) animals, trees, shrubs, plants and seeds;
(5) water;
(6) coins and other numismatic items, when purchased for purposes other than for use as a medium of exchange;
(7) postage stamps, when purchased for purposes other than mailing; and
(8) precious metals in the form of bullion, ingots, wafers and other forms.
(b) Gas, electricity, refrigeration and steam are not considered tangible personal property for the purpose of the tax imposed on utility services. Gas sold in containers or in bulk for purposes other than heating, cooking or lighting is considered tangible personal property. See section 527.2 of this Subchapter.
(c) Tangible personal property does not include:
(1) real property;
(2) intangible personal property.


     I call your attention to article "C" of the above cited law. "Tangible personal property does not include: (1) real property; (2) intangible personal property." This legal definition is clear. However, Casey LaLonde has chosen to ignore New York state law.


     Hypothetically, IF New York state did have a post-mortem right of publicity law at the time of Joan Crawford's death, by the terms of her will, right of publicity proceeds would belong to the the six charities named in Crawford's will. This is because the bequeathments to the named beneficiaries in Crawford's will are exact regarding the descriptions and amounts, with the singular except of the six charities.


The bequeathment amounts and property to the charities remained, legally speaking, open-ended: 

     "I direct my executors to divide all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, of whatsoever kind and nature and wheresoever situated, which shall belong to me or be subject to my disposal at the time of my death into eight equal shares and I give, devise and bequeath such shares to the following specified organizations, in the shares specified, for the general purposes of each organization."


     Since 2021, Casey LaLonde has increased his attempts to pass himself off as the legal rights owner of Joan Crawford's image. This appears to correlate with the passing of New York's revised post-mortem right of publicity law on May 29th, 2021, which Casey Lalonde, incorrectly, thinks applied to his mother, Cathy LaLonde,  and now himself. This falsity by LaLonde was confirmed on February 8th, 2022 via LaLonde's "business partner," Dominique Benedict (owner of Arkansas-based "Breakfast at Dominique's").


     Benedict falsely stated to the Arkansas Attorney General's office:

     "The [New York Right of Publicity] law was overturned by the state. The will and Joan's possessions all legally belong to Casey LaLonde."


     On December 1st, 2020, New York governor Andrew Cuomo signed a new bill into law regarding post-mortem right of publicity.

The new law became effective on May 29th, 2021. This revised law explicitly states that it is NOT retroactive, and only applies to those who died on or after May 29th, 2021. (Act, § 3)


     In addition, even if this new law was retroactive, it explicitly extends for only forty years after a person's death. § 50-f (8)

By January 2022, Joan Crawford had been dead for over 44 years. However, despite these obvious legal roadblocks, Casey LaLonde still maintains that he is the legal "representative" of Joan Crawford's estate, and that he holds an legal right to license the use of Crawford's image. 

     The complete new post-mortem right of publicity law can be viewed on New York's state legislation website here. 


     Casey LaLonde is NOT a legal representative of the Joan Crawford estate. Casey LaLonde has NEVER been a legal representative for the Joan Crawford estate, and he is forever legally barred from being a legal representative for the Joan Crawford estate.

     Joan Crawford's estate has no legal representative. Per New York state law, no person has ever, and cannot ever, legally represent Joan Crawford's estate in terms of Crawford's post-mortem right of publicity. Any person attempting to do so, is doing so illegally.




Casey's Estrangement From His Mother, Cathy LaLonde

     Casey LaLonde should not publicly state that he is a representative of Joan Crawford's family, but rather that he is a representative of the LaLonde family. He does not speak on behalf of Crawford's niece, Joan Lowe; Crawford's daughter, Cindy Jordan; Cindy's two sons or Christopher's four children. However, technically, he is not even a representative of the LaLonde family, namely his mother, Cathy LaLonde.


     According to multiple sources close to the LaLonde family, and confirmed by LaLonde himself, he and his mother were estranged for quite a considerable period of time prior to Cathy's death in January 2020. In a December 2011 YouTube interview with Dearly Departed Tours, LaLonde stated that he learned via the internet of Doyle's Joan Crawford auction in December 2011. The auction's items consisted entirely of Casey LaLonde's mother's property. It is reported that LaLonde's sister, Carla, is who assisted Cathy with arraigning that auction. However, Casey LaLonde knew nothing of it until he read about it online.

     During the same December 2011 YouTube interview, LaLonde stated that he and his wife "scraped together their savings" to bid on items.

At the auction, LaLonde won Joan Crawford's games table, a photo of Crawford with a letter to her by George Hurrell and a box of footage and audio materials that had belonged to Crawford. LaLonde paid $12,875.00 for these items. This is quite a considerable price to pay for LaLonde's own family heirlooms which belonged to his own mother. This is the first red flag of many that the LaLondes were/are a divided family, and at no time did Casey LaLonde actually speak on behalf of his mother regarding Joan Crawford.


     When Casey LaLonde's aunt, Cindy Jordan, passed away in 2007, LaLonde did not know she had died. As with the Doyle auction, LaLonde reportedly learned of Cindy's death via the internet. According to the webmaster of "The Best of Everything: A Joan Crawford Encyclopedia," LaLonde learned that Cindy passed away via a posting on that Crawford website.

     Similarly, when Joan Crawford's former secretary, Betty Barker, passed away in January 2012. At the time, Cathy LaLonde was notified of Barker's death and reportedly stated that she had no means of contacting her son, Casey, because she did not have his telephone number.

As with Cindy's death, LaLonde learned of Betty Barker's death (who he has the audacity to call "Aunt Betty") via the internet.


     In March 2017, when Casey LaLonde was asked by a reporter if his mother was watching the television series "Feud: Bette & Joan," he stated:

     "she may be watching, I don’t know. I hope she is." 


     Therefore, it appears LaLonde's estrangement from his mother lasted for over a decade. Being that he did not know of Cindy Jordan's death in 2007, the Doyle auction in 2011, Betty Barker's death in 2012, or if his mother was watching a 2017 television series based upon his own grandmother's life.


     The question for many is what caused this estrangement between Casey LaLonde and his mother, Cathy? One issue that has been cited in the Joan Crawford fan community is that LaLonde allegedly absconded property from his mother's home in 1997. Specifically, that he took the Joan Crawford "home movie" footage which he has attempted to license for years for his own monetary gain.

Reportedly, LaLonde took this footage from his mother's home without his mother's knowledge and/or permission. 


     According to Casey LaLonde's former associate, LaLonde stole this footage from his mother:

     "He did steal [the footage]. I remember when it happened. Casey told me his mother didn’t want to make the home movies public and Casey said he took them."


     On March 7th, 2022, via email Casey LaLonde made the following statements regarding his estrangement from his mother:

     "My mother and I had been estranged for a time, but eventually reconciled. However, in 2011, we were definitely not talking much. It wasn't adversarial by any means, we just didn't talk much. She didn't attend the auction, so she had no idea that I bid on the items. 


     As to the 2011 auction, my mother put many objects up for sale with Doyle Auction house. I didn't want to interfere with my mother's sale of the objects, so I registered as a bidder like anyone else."


     LaLonde's above claim that he did not want to "interfere" with his mother's auction, and chose to "scrape together his savings" to bid on the auction items, combined with his claim that his estrangement from his mother was not "adversarial" seems ridiculous. 

It is a reasonable conclusion that most people do not become estranged from their mother, particularly for such a long period of time, unless that estrangement has an adversarial origin, or if there is an ongoing adversarial conflict. Some sources have stated that Cathy LaLonde did not approve of her son's claim that he was a "representative" of Joan Crawford.


     In interviews, whenever LaLonde is asked questions regarding his mother, Cathy, he can not seem to give coherent answers. Likewise, when he is asked to share stories that his mother may have told him about Joan Crawford, LaLonde seems to freeze-up and usually gives rambling answers to sidestep the question. There is a reason for this; Casey LaLonde doesn't know very much about his mother's experiences with Joan Crawford, and was not able to ask his mother these questions in present day because the mother and son were estranged.




Marketing advertisements of the Joan Crawford Tonner dolls with the claim that the dolls

are "authorized" and "licensed by the Estate of Joan Crawford":




Casey LaLonde holding one of the falsely "authorized" and "licensed" Tonner dolls at a doll convention:




Casey LaLonde speaking to the audience at a screening of the Joan Crawford Home Movie Footage:



An auction photo of the box of footage Casey LaLonde purchased at the Doyle auction in December 2011:



An email Casey LaLonde sent to a Joan Crawford fan regarding his illegal agreement with Graymalkin Media:




Casey LaLonde displaying the republished "My Way of Life" book during a 2021 interview:




Photos of the physical 16 RPM record set of "My Way of Life":




The Library of Congress' record for the "My Way of Life" recording. This current record indicates the item as "withdrawn":



The Heritage Auction listing for the Yousuf Karsh portrait of Joan Crawford:




The 1959 Eve Arnold photo which depicts the alleged Yousuf Karsh portrait of Crawford that was auctioned by Casey LaLonde:




Casey LaLonde's certificate of authenticity for the Yousuf Karsh portrait:




A screenshot from a July 18th, 2021 interview with Casey LaLonde, with what appears to be

THE Yousuf Karsh portrait on the wall behind LaLonde's head:



A screenshot of "The Grand Hotel Blend" with the false claim that it is "Officially licensed from the Joan Crawford Estate":




A May 10th, 2020 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde with the Secaucus Public Library.

In this excerpt, Casey struggles with a very simple question, and reveals his true lack of knowledge:




A December 2011 interview excerpt of Casey Lalonde with Dearly Departed Tours.

In this excerpt, Casey confirms the details provided above regarding his lack of knowledge about the 2011 Doyle auction:



A December 2011 interview excerpt with Casey LaLonde and Dearly Departed Tours.

In this excerpt, Casey admits there are legal issues with his attempt to license Joan Crawford's image.


A December 2011 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde with Dearly Departed Tours

whereby Casey explains how he became involved with Joan Crawford's legacy:




A December 2011 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde with Dearly Departed Tours whereby Casey

explains the origin story of the Joan Crawford Tonner Dolls:




A December 2011 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde with Dearly Departed Tours whereby Casey

falsely states he owns the rights to the absconded Joan Crawford home movie footage:




A December 2011 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde with Dearly Departed Tours whereby Casey

states that he did take the Joan Crawford home movie footage from his mother's basement:




A complete listing of the footage materials Casey LaLonde purchased at the 2011 Doyle auction. 




A February 15th, 2022 screenshot advertisement of "The Grand Hotel Blend" with the false claim that it is "Officially licensed":




"Joan Crawford: Her Life In Letters"

     As mentioned in the above video excerpt by Casey LaLonde regarding the Robert Tonner dolls, LaLonde befriended a woman named Michelle Vogel who wrote one of the worst Joan Crawford biographies ever published in 2005, "Joan Crawford: Her Life in Letters." 

Not only is Vogal's book full of inaccurate information on Crawford, which included the citing of quotes of the fake Crawford biography "Conversations With Joan Crawford" by Roy Newquist, it also published letters that were taken directly from the internet.

     In addition, the book has a forward by Casey LaLonde, and his is quoted in the book to have met Christopher and Christina at some point. However, LaLonde claims in interviews that he never actually met either of these people.


      Casey LaLonde refers publicly to Christina and Christopher as "aunt Christina" and "uncle Christopher" despite the fact that LaLonde admits he has never so much as met either Christina or Christopher. Additionally, LaLonde has claimed that he was bullied and harassed in school by his peers due to the "Mommie Dearest" controversy. It is interesting that LaLonde would call a woman, whom he has never met (and is not technically even related to), "aunt" if he was harassed in school as a child due to a book that woman wrote. The only logical inference to be drawn from LaLonde's repeated use of the term "aunt" and "uncle" in regards to these people would be his continued attempt to further attach himself to the major players of Joan Crawford's life in order to enhance his own perceived importance to the general public and Crawford fandom.


     LaLonde also claims in the book's forward: "When [we were] not visiting [Joan], I would stay up late to watch "Mildred Pierce or "What Ever Happened To Baby Jane?" on the late show." This is despite LaLonde later stating in interviews that he didn't see "Baby Jane" until well after Joan had died due to his age.



Casey LaLonde on the DVD featurette for "Daisy Kenyon" inaccurately claiming that Joan Crawford's career

as an actress lasted over "six decades." Crawford's career lasted for 47 years. From 1925 to 1972.




Gary Sweeney: Casey LaLonde's "Creative Director"

      In December 2020, Casey LaLonde appointed Gary Sweeney as "The Creative Director of The Joan Crawford Estate." This is a worthless title being that LaLonde has no actual authority over "The Joan Crawford Estate" because it, legally, does not exist in the sense of operating, or licensing Crawford's image. However, that has not prevented Gary Sweeney from attempting to personally profit from this fake title. Judging by his knowledge, Gary Sweeney is not an expert on Joan Crawford, but rather he appears to be knowledgeable of old Hollywood in general, and is seemingly a "hanger-on" of the children of dead celebrities due to his general interest in the topic of old Hollywood.


      According to Sweeney, he first encountered Casey LaLonde in 2006, and interviewed him for his, now defunct, old Hollywood website, "Midnight Palace." Since that time, Sweeney and LaLonde have remained friends. Once LaLonde appointed Gary Sweeney as the "creative director" of Crawford's "estate," Sweeney  made it public by listing this title as his career/profession across his various public social media accounts.

     Later, Gary Sweeney would contact a 22-year-old girl named Dominique Benedict who is attempting to start a small coffee company in Arkansas. Sweeney and LaLonde falsely presented themselves to Benedict as "official representatives" of Joan Crawford's "estate," with the idea for Benedict to "license" the use of Joan Crawford's image from them as one of her company's coffee flavors. According to Benedict, the profit percentages for the sale of this "Joan Crawford coffee blend" goes to Casey LaLonde and Gary Sweeney. 




Gary Sweeney with Casey LaLonde at UCLA in 2008:




Gary Sweeney's social media accounts with the faux title of "The Creative Director at the Joan Crawford Estate":




2022 promotion by Gary Sweeney as the faux "creative director of the Joan Crawford Estate":




Close-ups of the Joan Crawford Tonner doll box and wardrobe tags, with the faux "licensed by the Estate of Joan Crawford":




A September 2020 email from Casey LaLonde to what he thought was a documentary producer interested

in featuring him in a documentary about Joan Crawford.

There are several outright LIES given within this email by Casey LaLonde. Namely, the claim that he "owns" the rights to

Joan Crawford's autobiographies and that he and his sister, Carla, are the only Crawford family members "standing" (Crawford has eight living grandchildren - not two). However, most appalling is Casey LaLonde's "fee" schedule to appear in a Joan Crawford

documentary, and his fee schedule to "license" the reportedly stolen Joan Crawford home movies:




Christina Crawford with Lypsinka at Town Hall, New York (May 6th, 1998).

Casey LaLonde with Lypsinka/John Epperson at Film Forum, New York (May 10th, 2017):




A 2020 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde admitting he never met Christina Crawford, despite he earlier claims:




An excerpt from page 11 of "Joan Crawford: Her Life In Letters" with Casey LaLonde claiming to have had

interactions with Christina Crawford at one point in time:



A March 2022 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde giving the wrong birth years for

Joan Crawford's children, who are also his own family members:




A March 2022 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde admitting that he is estranged from Cindy's sons, and that he

doesn't even know how many first cousins he has:




A March 2022 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde stating where he has appeared to speak about Joan Crawford and his claim that he "tries to do as much as he can to support his grandmother's memory" despite his large fee schedule exhibited above:



A March 2022 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde falsely claiming his mother inherited Joan Crawford's "personal property,"

and that he interprets that to mean he has the legal right to license Crawford's image:



A March 2022 interview excerpt of Casey LaLonde talking about Breakfast At Dominique's "Joan Crawford Coffee Blend," 

and LaLonde's absurd claim that he is keeping Crawford's memory alive with this coffee, citing her last film was over 50 years ago:



A March 2022 interview excerpt of Breakfast At Dominique's owner, Dominique Benedict, stating that Casey LaLonde and Gary Sweeney contacted her, and that the sale proceeds are split between LaLonde and Sweeney, despite the fact that neither LaLonde

nor Sweeney holds any legal rights to Joan Crawford's right of publicity, nor any legal authority of Crawford's "estate."


"Joan Crawford's estate actually reached out to me. A percentage [of the coffee's sale] goes to the estate to support the families of the icons. The proceeds from Joan's blend, it's split up. We have it to where it goes to Casey, her grandson, and the "creative director" of the estate [aka Gary Sweeney]." - Breakfast At Dominique's owner, Dominique Benedict




March 2022 interview excerpts of Sweeney on the podast "Calling Old Hollywood" discussing Casey LaLonde, and his

faux title of "The Creative Director of the Joan Crawford Estate":




Casey LaLonde's Lack of Joan Crawford Knowledge

     From March 2006 until August 2009, Casey LaLonde engaged in an "Ask Casey" forum on the website "Legendary Joan Crawford." The forum involved Joan Crawford fans writing emails to LaLonde asking him various questions about Crawford's life and family. Due to the estrangement between LaLonde and his mother (therefore unable to ask her any questions), and with his lack of knowledge regarding Joan Crawford's life, this forum is cringeworthy and embarrassing. Based upon the entries on this forum, the fans writing to LaLonde knew much more about Crawford and her life than LaLonde. However, that did not prevent LaLonde from "confirming" false internet myths and lies about Crawford. The myths included the claim that Joan Crawford once owned Leeza Gibbons' Los Angeles house. Los Angeles property records confirm that Gibbons' house was never owned by Joan Crawford.

     In September 2010, LaLonde also engaged in a "Q & A with Casey LaLonde" forum on the Silver Screen Oasis message board.

Similar to the "Ask Casey" forum, this "Q & A" is compiled with responses by LaLonde that are elusively and uninformative regarding any inside details of Crawford's life which are not readily found in most Joan Crawford biographies.

     Both of these forums stand as testaments to the lack of inside knowledge which one might expect from a family member.


      In a March 2022 interview with Casey LaLonde's friend, Gary Sweeney, who recently began using the faux title "The Creative Director of The Joan Crawford Estate", Sweeney stated that he and LaLonde are developing an "official Joan Crawford estate" website so that people will have an "official" source for Joan Crawford information. However, much of the information LaLonde shares in his interviews are stories he has taken from the poorly-researched Crawford biographies, the internet or what he has been told by Crawford fans. As a result, LaLonde has repeated several of the false Crawford rumors and myths that he has read.


     Due to LaLonde's erroneous claim that he is an "official source" for Joan Crawford information, he is "confirming" these falsehoods when he repeats them. This is a true danger with Casey LaLonde's statements. He is not well-versed on the topic of Joan Crawford, and makes many errors of fact when speaking about Crawford's career and life.


     One such "confirmation" by LaLonde is the claim that Christina Crawford began writing her book, "Mommie Dearest," prior to Joan Crawford's death, and that Crawford knew about the book. LaLonde states this is the reason Christina and Christopher were disinherited. This is false.

Casey LaLonde has no actual insider information regarding this, as one may think due to him being Crawford's grandson. Yet, LaLonde has repeatedly stated this claim in interviews and documentaries. LaLonde's singular source for this information is writer Charlotte Chandler.

Chandler wrote the 2008 Joan Crawford biography "Not The Girl Next Door." Within Chandler's book, and in her subsequent interviews, she blatantly lied and made the false claim that Crawford told her that she knew about Christina's book, "Mommie Dearest." Joan Crawford never stated this to Chandler, and evidence demonstrates that Chandler was not even in close proximity to Crawford during her last years.

     Not only does this webmaster have evidence against Chandler's claims to have repeatedly visited/interviewed Crawford during her final years of 1974-1977, Chandler herself wrote a completely alternate version of her experiences with Joan Crawford in her 1984 autobiography "The Ultimate Seduction." In "The Ultimate Seduction," Chandler writes in detail of her one alleged meeting with Crawford, which took place in Crawford's Fifth Avenue apartment. In her 1984 book, Chandler describes the Fifth Avenue apartment in detail. However, Crawford moved from her Fifth Avenue apartment in 1968, therefore, Chandler, unwittingly, confirms in her 1984 autobiography that she never visited Crawford in her final apartment.

Apparently, Chandler overlooked her 1984 writings regarding Crawford when she published her erroneous 2008 biography.

      Aside from the evidence that Chandler did not visit/interview Joan during her final years, there is evidence (which will be made available on this website) that Crawford's prior wills, going back to 1964, disinherited Christina and Christopher as beneficiaries with similar terminology to her 1976 will.


     Casey LaLonde has attempted to combat Christina Crawford's lies by relaying the very limited memories he has of his mother's stories.

However, because LaLonde is not a firsthand source to any details, and was unable to obtain any in-depth details from his mother or her sister, Cindy, due to his estrangement from both women, his efforts have not necessarily helped Joan Crawford. A notable example of this are the appearances of LaLonde and Christina Crawford in the 2011 Discovery channel documentary "The Will: The Estate of Joan Crawford."

Because LaLonde is so inarticulate, and has no firsthand knowledge of anything, his statements helped to make Christina, who is very articulate, sound more believable to viewers.




An excerpt from the 2011 documentary "The Will," with Casey LaLonde repeating the Charlotte Chandler lie:




A June 23rd, 2021 email from Casey LaLonde to a Crawford fan, and perspective buyer, who asked him to verify

if this was the same Karsh portrait as depicted in the 1959 Eve Arnold photo. Casey LaLonde claims it is:




A  current screenshot of the "Official Joan Crawford Estate" website that Sweeney claims to be building.

Note, the same BETTY BARKER "Joan Crawford" signature is being used for this website, as LaLonde has used for the Tonner Dolls:




Casey LaLonde's Abandoned Joan Crawford Biography

     In the early 2000s, Casey LaLonde had partnered with a Joan Crawford researcher to publish a Joan Crawford biography. According to the Crawford researcher (whose name is omitted here), they had a disagreement with LaLonde regarding the biography attempt, and they never spoke again.

     The researcher has allowed me to quote their statements regarding the experiences they had with Casey LaLonde below:


     "I was writing [the biography] with Casey LaLonde but it never got published, we finished it. And then I had a falling out with Casey, so that was that. I spend years on the book. and I was pretty proud of it. I did 95% of the work and Casey blessed the project but wanted to have his name as co-author and I was fine with it - he also was going to include the home movies as a DVD insert. When [things happened] with the publisher, I wanted to take the book elsewhere and get a new deal, Casey told me he was taking HIS book and publishing it on his own and I said it wasn't his book, it was mine. I spent years writing it, I found all the amazing rare photos and did years of research. I never provided him with the working files and photos and he stopped talking to me. Which is fine by me. He was a bit off and he really didn't provide anything great other than the home movies, but I was willing to move on without the home movies as part of the book. At the end of the day I was done and the book never came to be."

     "He also was mad because every time we went to an event together everyone thought I was Joan’s grandson. And when I was like no, no, I’m not, Casey is. They would look at him and go “oh..”


    The researcher Casey LaLonde was working with on the biography also stated that LaLonde did, in fact, absconder the Joan Crawford home movie footage from his mother, Cathy:

     "He did steal them...I remember when it happened. Casey told me his mother didn’t want to make the home movies public and Casey said he took them."




A February 2008 message board post by Gary Sweeney (using his website's name) detailing his meeting Casey LaLonde at UCLA:



The response by the family of Cindy Crawford Jordan when shown an email sent by Casey LaLonde with the false claim

"...it is me and my sister as the last family members standing":


     In response to his Instagram post, Dabcha became extremely combative, unhinged, threatening, and repeatedly insulted the long-standing Crawford researcher for exposing her communications to him. Dabcha falsely claimed in her response comments that she "tried to get the facts." However, that is obviously not true. Dabcha was given all of the facts, along with the evidence, regarding Casey LaLonde. However, she chose to ignore the facts and to proceed onward with the interview she always intended to conduct, despite the clear misrepresentation to the Webmaster in her messages.


     Not only did Dabcha attack the Webmaster, she called upon her friends and followers to do the same, and encouraged them to descend upon the Webmaster's Instagram account. This included her friend/podcast co-host, Virginia Polyzos, who uses the Instagram account "drivenbywonder." In equally unhinged gaslighting rants, Polyzos repeatedly attacked the Webmaster throughout the comments section of his post, as well as other Joan Crawford fans who defended him.


Hyperparasites:

A parasite that hosts itself to another parasite


     In connection with the 2026 re-release of the 1932 Joan Crawford film "Letty Lynton," (which Casey LaLonde has erroneously, and maliciously, attempted to take credit for achieving its restoration and re-release) several internet bloggers/social media creators (who attempt to make a name for themselves by using/exploiting classic film celebrities) have solicited interviews with Casey. Their requests appear to be for no other reason than he is a grandchild of Joan Crawford. As demonstrated well on this website, Casey is inapt regarding any actual first-hand information about Joan Crawford. He cannot answer basic questions about Joan Crawford's life or even his mother's life with Joan Crawford. Therefore, a meaningful interview for actual insight into Joan Crawford does not seem logical with Casey LaLonde. However, bloggers/social media creators know that an "interview with Joan Crawford's family member" can potentially garner views and followers to their own accounts and platforms for their own benefit. This appears to be the actual reason for seeking an interview with Casey LaLonde, rather than for any true research and education into Crawford's life. As a byproduct, these hyperparasites are giving Casey a platform to appear "legitimate," when he is anything but legitimate.



     Not only are the videos strange, she attempts to outright defame the Webmaster by claiming he has "doxed" people online (not true) and that he has attacked other people (also not true).
     She also attempts to question the origin of the information on this very website about Casey LaLonde. However, IF she were a minimally decent researcher, rather than in inapt blogger/content creator who seems to look for fast and easy information on Google, she would have readily found several of the sources for the information documented here regarding Casey LaLonde. Many of the sources are provided with the information on this website. Much of the information regarding Casey LaLonde's estrangement and poor relationship with his mother, Cathy, and family members comes directly from Casey himself in other interviews and emails. Most, if not all, of those interviews are still online. Had Dabcha actually attempted to research Casey (as she claimed to the Webmaster she was doing), she would have known all of this information.

     Furthermore, Dabcha's attempted initial deception upon the Webmaster becomes even more apparent based upon her comments regarding Casey LaLonde in her martyr video. In the video, Dabcha (an admitted novice in regard to Joan Crawford research) actually attempts to defend Casey LaLonde against the facts and evidence presented on this very website. Dabcha claims Casey's estrangement from his family, mother and aunt (the very people he claims to represent and speak for) is not the public's concern. Dabcha also claims Casey illegally profiting from the Crawford fan base, and public at large, is also none of the public's concern. Dabcha rationalizes Casey's actions and behavior by stating he is, essentially, friendly. 


     In addition, during her bizarre martyr videos, Dabcha claims she never intended the interview to be about Casey LaLonde (as she presented to the Webmaster), and claims the interview was only about Joan Crawford. Not only is that an obvious lie when watching the interview itself (she asks Casey direct personal questions about himself and Joan), but she told the Webmaster that she would "like to go in with all perspectives" specifically regarding Casey. Therefore, she blatantly lies throughout her martyr videos in response to her being, rightly, called out for using manipulative tactics upon the Webmaster. All the while, during the videos Dabcha is simultaneously attempting to gaslight the Webmaster, this website's content, and any person who opposes Casey LaLonde.


     Naturally, Dominique Benedict, the woman who operates "Breakfast At Dominique's" (who is profiled on this website, and who works in direct conjunction with Casey LaLonde to knowingly DEFRAUD Crawford fans and consumers with coffee that claims to be "licensed" by the FAKE "Joan Crawford Estate") made the following defamatory, and gaslighting, statement on Dabcha's martyr video.

     In response, Dabcha, in further attempts to gaslight and defame the Webmaster claimed she has received messages from people claiming he has "harrassed" them, which is totally false.



     On the following day, May 23, 2026, Dabcha posted a three-part video on her Instagram account. In the videos, Dabcha applies makeup to her face as she melts down into a textbook narcissistic martyr routine. Her video title threatens to "sue" the Webmaster for his Instagram post, however, her basis in law and fact for such a lawsuit remains unclear. 


     In the video Dabcha gives disjointed ramblings to portray herself as a "victim," against the "internet troll" (a.k.a. the decades-long Crawford researcher who has provided the public with boundless amounts of free Crawford material for well over 20 years) who posted her manipulative messages on his own Instagram account. Dabcha also posted the same martyr videos on YouTube for maximum sympathy and views. 

     These videos are apparently posted in an attempt to portray herself as a "victim" in response to the clear manipulation she attempted upon the Webmaster, and his decision to document her communications to him on his own Instagram account.




Malak Dabcha's Martyr Video (May 23, 2026)




Below are screenshots of all messages and emails between

the Webmaster of "The Concluding Chapter of Crawford" and Malak Dabcha (a.k.a. "Coco")



Malak Dabcha (a.k.a. "Coco") The "Casual" Joan Crawford Fan

     On May 4, 2026, Malak Dabcha, who operates the low-follower Instagram account "Boulevard_noir" under the name "Coco" contacted the researcher and Webmaster of the longstanding Joan Crawford website "The Concluding Chapter of Crawford" through Instagram.

According to her messages, she specifically contacted him regarding Casey Lalonde, and the Webmaster's recent posts denouncing Casey LaLonde and his actions. (Note: The Webmaster's posts also provided readers the direct link to this very page, "The LaLonde Exposè.")

     Dabcha (an apparently failed actress, failed model, failed filmmaker, and  failed realtor now turned Instagram content creator, who later said she is just "a casual Joan fan," ) stated the following in her first message to the decades-long Crawford researcher:


     "Hey there! I just saw your post on Casey and I'd love to speak with you. I'm interviewing him in a week. I'd like to go in with all perspectives."


     After receiving no response from the Webmaster by May 9, 2026, Dabcha pushed harder to make contact with the Webmaster, and posted a comment on one of his Instagram posts stating:


     "Hello! Please check your DMs!" (private messages)


     Dabcha, in apparent desperation, also left comments on the posts of at least one other Joan Crawford Instagram account asking that person to also make contact with her about Casey. By this point, Dabcha had sent multiple unsolicited messages to the Webmaster asking specifically about Casey LaLonde in preparation of her interview with LaLonde. One message, also dated May 9, 2026, stated the following:


     "Hello! I’ve tried to reach out to you through my main account but haven’t been able to. I am interviewing Casey LaLonde in two days and would love to speak with you first about the things you’ve said on your page!"


     It is clear from these messages from Dabcha that her claimed reason for contacting the Webmaster was singularly regarding Casey LaLonde's questionable behavior and claims. In response, the Webmaster simply provided Dabcha with the direct link to this webpage, "The LaLonde Exposé," to learn more about Casey. Dabcha responded:


     "I’m doing two pieces. On one Letty Lynton. In depth. And one interview with Casey, and I’ve always felt that you are a great authority on Joan Crawford’s legacy. I really want to do her justice as I’ve been waiting for years for the right moment to do something about her that would be impactful."


     Despite her initial claimed reason for contacting the Webmaster, it appeared that researching into Casey LaLonde was not Dabcha's actual reason for contacting the Webmaster and seeking his assistance. Rather than discussing LaLonde and his actions, Dabcha pointed her interest directly towards her obvious ulterior motive for contacting the Webmaster, which was to ask him to provide her with information regarding the lawsuit surrounding the 1932 film "Letty Lynton":


     "I’d love to also ask you some questions about Letty Lynton. Of course I’ll credit you in the video for the research!"


     Dabcha then stated:


     "My main issue is that I’ve been having trouble piecing the exact timeline of the original lawsuit and the appeals that followed. And I would love to know if there are specific things about Joan that you feel are under discussed that I should bring up, since you know so much about her and her life."


     Now suspecting Dabcha was disingenuous regarding her true reasons for contacting him, the Webmaster asked her to simply email him her questions. On May 9, 2026, Dabcha emailed the Webmaster the following:


"Thank you for answering my DM over on IG.


Like I said, I'm interviewing Casey and working on a piece about Letty Lynton. Thank you for sending over the website about Casey. I will steer clear of the Christina questions in an effort to try to limit his speaking to what he doesn't know first hand. I feel it might do more harm than good.


I would, on the other hand, love any information you might have on the timeline of the Letty Lynton lawsuit, and appeals that followed. I am trying to piece it together through the archives of the New York Times, but it's still a little fuzzy. I would also love to know if there are any under-discussed topics related to Joan that you know and feel should be more represented online, I'm happy to include it in my research and video.

I, of course, will give you full credit on the research materials you offer.


Thank you again.
Cheers,

Malak Dabcha
CEO
Boulevard Noir Films"



(Note: Screenshots of all messages/emails quoted here are provided below for transparency) 



     After reading her email, the Webmaster suspected Dabcha simply wanted quick and easy information regarding the "Letty Lynton" lawsuit, and that she had no true intention of confronting Casey with the facts presented on "The LaLonde Exposé," or objectively interviewing him by asking relevant questions that any interviewer should ask Casey LaLonde. This course of action did not seem to be in keeping with Dabcha's initial messages. Believing Dabcha was attempting to manipulate information from him, the Webmaster chose not to engage in any further communications with Dabcha and did not respond to her email.


     On May 22, 2026, Dabcha posted a video of her interview with Casey LaLonde. The interview/video is constructed in a way to glorify Casey and legitimize him as a "representative" of the fabricated "Joan Crawford Estate" that Casey has recently manufactured. As well as a representative of Crawford herself and of her other grandchildren, with whom Casey has been, and apparently still is, largely estranged.

     (Note: While Casey may have communications with his sister, Carla, it does not appear that he has communicated with Joan Crawford's other six grandchildren in many years, if ever. It also does not appear that Casey shares any proceeds he obtains from illegally "licensing" Crawford's name with those Crawford family members, nor with the six charities Joan Crawford listed in her 1976 Will to the beneficiaries of such proceeds. The five charities were to receive ALL remaining assets of Crawford's estate, aside from the specific assets bequeathed to those named in her Will. If one follows Joan Crawford's Will, Casey is, in essence, robbing the six charities named in her Will against Crawford's final wishes)


     During Dabcha's interview with Casey, he has the audacity to claim he is partly responsible for the fast restoration and re-release of "Letty Lynton," which is an outright lie. Casey claims during the interview that he met with Warner Bros. executives/personal at a Starbucks in November 2025 to get the film not only restored in five months, but also released by May 2026. 

     (Note: According to sources with Warner Bros. the film had already been restored many years ago with the intent to re-release it in 2026. Several persons in the Crawford research community were/are well aware of this fact. It is suspected Casey already knew this information. While Casey may have had a causal conversation with someone at Warners at the end of 2025 to ask about the film's re-release, he had nothing to do with the film's restoration or release, as he has repeatedly attempted to present to the public.)


     On May 22, 2026, the Webmaster made the following post on his own Instagram account regarding his communications with Dabcha.

In the post, he attached screenshots of her interview/video with Casey LaLonde and screenshots of her messages to the Webmaster.

     Withn the post, the Webmaster also denounces Dabcha's glorification of Casey LaLonde when she had prior knowledge of his actions.

He also addressed the obvious attempt by Dabcha to manipulate information from him under the guise that she planned to conduct an interview with Casey LaLonde that included "all perspectives" of Casey. Dabcha did not do that.





     While Dabcha is not directly involved with Casey LaLonde's blatant fraud upon the public, she is an example of the type of person who will ignore the facts in order to promote and glorify Casey LaLonde's lies and fraud in the interest of promoting herself and her own notoriety, while gaslighting, and defaming those who do present the facts.


From Merriam-Webster Dictionary:


"Hanger-on" (noun)
hang·er-on ˈhaŋ-ər-ˌȯn -ˌän


Simple Definition:
One that hangs around a person, place, or institution especially for personal gain





     Climbing onto the bandwagon, another Instagram account (whom the Webmaster does not even know, and has never engaged in communication) claimed to have "went down the rabbit hole" and that the Webmaster has "argued" with other Joan Crawford pages, which is also defamatory and TOTALLY FALSE.

      The Webmaster of "The Concluding Chapter of Crawford" has correlations with nearly all active Joan Crawford social media pages, and has never "argued" with the owner of those social media accounts. In fact, many Crawford pages and social media accounts use the Webmaster's research and content within their own content, and most credit the Webmaster for his research and contributions to Joan Crawford scholarship.


      In response, and in full gaslighting and defamatory mode, Dabcha claimed she had received messages from people the Webmaster "harrassed" before she even made her videos. Which begs the question, IF that were true, WHY was she desperately attempting to make contact with the Webmaster for his assistance with her interview and videos if that were the case?


     These screenshots are posted here to demonstrate the level of gaslighting and defamation these people will lower themselves.



Below is a screenshot of the post made by the Webmaster of

"The Concluding Chapter of Crawford" on his Instagram account:


 John Joseph Krukowski:

The Self-Proclaimed "pop culture historian" (whatever that is)


    On June 17, 2026, John Joseph Krukowski posted on his Instagram account about his alleged "broken heart" that Casey LaLonde (a man Krukowski admittedly did not know well and apparently only met twice) had died. Krukowski goes on to say that Casey allegedly taught him so much about Joan Crawford. As an example,  Krukowski states that Casey taught him that Steven Spielberg's first directorial assignment was to direct Joan Crawford (in "Night Gallery in 1969).


     Interestingly, Krukowski's social media platforms are filled with him telling the public about the "facts" of old Hollywood stars, including many videos on the topic of Joan Crawford and glorification of the film "Mommie Dearest." However, Krukowski didn't know this extremely basic, entry-level information about Joan Crawford and Steven Spielberg? Is Krukowski a liar or just plain dumb? It's hard to know which may be the case based upon Krukowski's videos, which are created for, and targeted to, TikTok audiences. Meaning that Krukowski talks as fast as he possibly can to share information (often times MISINFORMATION that he simply read online somewhere and apparently thought would make good click-bait content for views) before the viewer has time to get thoroughly freaked-out by his Shannon Doherty-esque asymmetrical eyes and swipes to another mindless TikToc video. 


     In Krukowski's tribute to the life of con artist Casey, he states, "While some overly invested fans had their conspiracies about Casey..."

It's interesting that someone who did not even know the bare bones facts about Joan Crawford's acting career has the audacity to call those who have put in years of research investigating Casey LaLonde conspiracy theorists. Krukowski outright dismisses facts and evidence in favor of a good post to bring attention to himself and his "friendship" with someone he met twice. Needless to say, such is to be expected by a person whose platforms' content library is nearly entirely composed of their own face front and center to the viewer, rather than an image of the topic he is discussing - which is typically a real celebrity who had talent, and not a Hollywood hanger-on hyperparasite.